e-deo

Interdiction du "mariage" homo en Californie : les défenseurs de la famille plutôt satisfaits

Bill Donohue, président de la Catholic League :

The shame of it all is that after the citizens of California said no to gay marriage last fall—the people always say no (the record is 30-0 in state ballot initiatives)—homosexual radicals sought to do an end-run around the democratic process and have unelected judges overrule the express will of the people. But the opponents of democracy, and common sense, lost today and that is how it should be. No one supports two men getting married save for white people who have spent too much time in the classroom. >>>

Tony Perkins, président du Family Research Council :

Over one million Californians signed petitions to place Proposition 8 on the ballot and over seven million voters approved the measure on Election Day. California's Constitution gives its citizens the right of self-governance and we are pleased that the court resisted demands to strip the right of the people to amend the state constitution. Even this widely-recognized liberal court understands that overturning Proposition 8 would represent a repudiation of the state Constitution it is sworn to uphold.

Unfortunately, the Court chose to ignore the plain meaning of Proposition 8 and will force state recognition of same-sex 'marriage' licenses issued last year. The Court's recognition of these 'marriages' clearly seeds the ground for a possible legal battle before the U.S. Supreme Court.

At every opportunity, the people of California have voted to protect marriage because they recognize the far reaching consequences that redefining marriage will have for children, the family, religious liberties, businesses and every facet of American society. Today's decision should encourage pro-family activists not only in California but across the country. Marriage redefinition is not inevitable unless advocates of the family stand aside and allow it to happen. >>>

Vigilance face au lobby homo

Aaron Zelinsky est favorable au "mariage" homo. Dans The Huffington Post, il se réjouit de la décision de la Cour suprême de Californie :

While some commentators criticize the California Court's decision, Strauss v. Horton is actually good for gay marriage in the long term.

The Court's decision drives home that the future of gay rights lies at the ballot box and not in the courts. We should view the California Court not as opposing gay marriage, but rather as promoting public deliberation and democratic action on the subject of equal rights.

As a technical matter, the central issue in Strauss was whether the sentence "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California" was a constitutional amendment or a constitutional revision. In practice, the political question presented by Strauss was whether the California Supreme Court would strike down a popularly enacted constitutional change and restore its earlier judicial decision supporting same-sex marriage.

By upholding Proposition 8, the California Court effectively tossed the ball back to the voters of the Golden State. The Court thereby ensured the long-term outcome of gay marriage: Given the strong support of younger voters, gay marriage will be approved in California by ballot initiative, perhaps quite soon. Moreover, when gay marriage is approved by popular vote, conservatives will not be able to blame a "judicial activist" court for their loss.

Gay marriage will stand on sounder footing when it is popularly enacted rather than judicially imposed. One can imagine the wedge issue Strauss could have handed the Republican Party had the Court overturned the decision of the California electorate. Instead, opponents of same sex marriage must fight it out again at the ballot box.

Aaron Zelinsky réalise que le lobby homo a tout à perdre à passer en force. Il est persuadé que les jeunes, majoritairement favorables aux parodies homosexuelles de mariage, vont permettre un jour ou l'autre la victoire de son camp. Il ne prend pas en compte l'immigration (les minorités latinos mais surtout afro-américaines ont davantage voté pour la proposition 8, donc pour interdire le "mariage" homo), ni les conversions ou reconversions, ces chrétiens "born again" : on ne compte plus les libéraux qui ont rejoint les rangs conservateurs ces dernières décennies... Mais la forte hausse du nombre d'athées (8% en 1990, 15% en 2008, viennent-ils des confessions chrétiennes progressistes déjà contaminées par la culture de mort ou des rangs évangéliques et catholiques fidèles au Magistère ?) est inquiétante. Et le positionnement de plus en plus social et environnemental, de moins en moins sociétal de certaines "églises" évangéliques interroge. Vigilance !

La Californie échappe aux parodies homosexuelles de mariages

Séisme en Californie

Le lobby homosexuel vient de prendre une énorme raclée !

Six des sept juges de la Cour suprême de Californie ont estimé que le référendum qui a vu la victoire de la "proposition 8" était légal et ne devait pas être annulé.

EDITION SPECIALE demain matin sur e-deo.

Restez connectés !

Le "mariage" homo sera interdit lundi

en Californie.

Enfin, si la Cour suprême de l'Etat respecte le choix des Californiens qui ont majoritairement voté pour la "proposition 8" à l'automne dernier...

"Mr President, You Are Authorizing The Destruction Of Freedom For 1 Million Of Little Human Beings Every Year !"

Extrait d'un sermon du révérend John Piper (Wiki [fr], [en]), qui dirige l'organisation "Desiring God" et officie à l'église baptiste Bethlehem à Minneapolis (Minnesota) :

D'après un sondage Gallup publié vendredi 15 mai 2009, 51 % des sondés aux Etats-Unis se déclarent "pro-life".

Carla Bruni Rips The Pope

La Catholic League communique :

Carla Bruni, wife of French president Nicolas Sarkozy, is angry that Pope Benedict XVI casts serious doubt on the efficacy of condoms to stop AIDS. She said that such teachings left her “profoundly secular,” and she called upon the Church to “evolve.”

Catholic League president Bill Donohue doesn’t agree:

When the pope was in France, he urged the people to acknowledge the “irreplaceable” role of religion in society, gently nudging the French to rethink their fondness for secularism. President Sarkozy responded by saying it would be “madness” for his country, which “accepts its Christian roots,” to “deprive ourselves” of religion. Perhaps he should have addressed his remarks to his wife.

It is really saying something when Bruni, who lives in one of the most secular societies in the world, concludes that the pope’s position on condoms is making her “profoundly secular.” In other words, when the pope calls on rational human beings to put the brakes on their libido—so that they may actually live long and healthy lives—he is pushing people like Bruni right over the edge. What a confession this is. It used to be that European elites did not talk disparagingly about the pope in public. But now that they have embraced the amorality that is the mark of secularism, common decency has been thrown overboard.